Liturgy
This link will keep 'parishioners-at-large' in touch with current creative liturgy sources and resources that respect a variety of 'traditions' within the Church.
COMMONWEAL Magazine
A 'lay' Catholic weekly publication with an accent on an intelligent analysis and commentary on curent issues, trends and concerns of interest to Catholics.
National Catholic Reporter
A national Catholic lay newspaper covering events not usually covered or presented with a clerical bias in the local diocesan press or but of concern and interest to Catholics.
Survivos' Network for those Abused by Priests or Religious
A National Network of self-help support groups for people abused by clergy or religious.
Bishop Accountability
Vital information about the disclosure of sexual abuse and related issues affecting Catholics in the pew and the manner in which Bishops continue to exempt themselves from accountability
Voice of the Faithful
A 'movement' of lay Catholics 'inspired' by the abuse scandal calling for greater accountability of bishops to 'Catholics in the Pew.'
+ 33rd Week in Ordinary Time
Keep hope alive!
Readings: Revelation 5:1-10 Psalm 149:1-6, 9 Luke 19:41-44
_As Jesus drew near Jerusalem, he saw the city and wept over it, saying, “if this day you only knew what makes for peace – but now it is hidden from your eyes.” [Luke 19:41]
In Christian liturgy and literature, he Church has often been referred to as “the new Jerusalem” and heaven as “the new and eternal Jerusalem.” I think it’s a good simile. If you have ever been to the old section of Jerusalem, you surely would have noted the appropriateness of this comparison. Ancient Jerusalem is still very much in evidence if not literally, surely in its ambiance. A walk from the site of the ancient praetorium to Calvary – now well within the city limits – will surely give you a sense of what it may have been like when Jesus made that last fateful journey.
Today Jerusalem is truly an international city and bears within its womb and walls, the extremes of every race and religion. Jews still narrate the story of the great exodus and Christians break the bread of Eucharist while Islamic temples broadcast their ancient chants from minarets that echo through the streets in the wee hours of the morning.
This is the city over which Jesus wept not because it did not make him king but because it did not recognize its day of visitation, that is to say, its moment of opportunity. In reading a passage such as this, we need to put away preconceived notions about our understanding of Jesus’ messianic role in the light of its Christological evolution in Christian teaching today. Jesus was not about establishing new religious structures but about announcing the universality of God’s love – for Jews and gentiles, male and female, of every race and nation.
Would it be accurate to state that Jesus is weeping not just over Jerusalem but over our war torn world? And yet one cannot fail to see signs of hope on the horizon. Bernard Lonergan, Carol Rahner and Carl Jung support this very Christian notion that it is in our moments of deepest despair that a new wisdom emerges leading to a common vision of a new world in which love and respect overcome evil and injustice. Is it possible that in the midst of the turmoil in which our world seems enmeshed people of good can bring that vision to reality not through confrontation but through collaboration?
Daily Scripture Archive»A Rendezvous with God
Although some folks eat to live and others live to eat, there are few people who do not enjoy a good meal. And for some, every meal is a social event and an excuse for a celebration. That may be why some people find it difficult to eat alone. Eating is more than the ingestion of food. It’s an active engagement, a sacred ritual that nourishes the soul as well as the body. I suppose that is why a meal is often connected with the observance of significant life-events. Beyond that, it is often an opportunity for strangers to become friends and can even be the occasion for the restoration of broken relationships even without Alka-Seltzer!
Whatever the circumstances, a good meal — even an impromptu meal — doesn’t just happen spontaneously. It takes preparation and a great deal of care in the presentation of the food especially if guests are present. Moreover, we need to avoid distractions that detract from ‘table conversation’. Whenever I offer the prayer of invocation and blessing at a wedding reception, I usually include a guarded prayer for the musicians: “May the music be loud enough to have fun and soft enough for us to talk!” How often has it happened that family and friends having traveled a great distance for a celebration only to find it necessary to compete with the din of a dancing band or DJ?
Among our biblical mentors this morning are Abraham and Sarah who welcomed three strangers and served a modest but attractive meal to them. There were no interstate highways and no Blimpi’s, Whimpy’s or McDonalds in those days. ‘Biblical highway travelers’ were welcomed by considerate ‘highway hosts’ along the way and were often occasions for a rendezvous with God. It was during such an encounter that the promise made by God to Abraham and Sarah was to be fulfilled namely, that even in their old age, they would be the parents of a son who would be the first of many descendents and Abraham the father of many nations.
Notice the dynamics in the narration of this story: first the setting “by the Oak of Mamre” – a place of great significance because it was the location where Abraham had encountered God on numerous occasions. The location is not neutral. Then Abraham recognized in the visitors special messengers of God: “My Lord if I find favor with you, do not pass by your servant.” Recognition is important because it is a mark of respect. Next came the welcome and invitation to a meal: “Rest yourselves… let me bring a little bread that you may refresh yourselves.” An open heart and acceptance predisposes both the host and the guests for what follows. “Then he took the cures and milk and the calf that he had prepared, and set it before them; and he stood by them under the tree while they ate.” The engagement is culminated in the eating of the meal. It was only at the conclusion of the meal that the purpose of the visitation was revealed — the fulfillment of the promise that Abraham would bear a son. Sarah laughed at the possibility but they were assured the promise was not to be taken lightly. Still, the full realization of what took place during that visitation would not be appreciated until years later as the story was told and retold and embellished by the author of Genesis during the Babylonian exile.
This story is included among today’s readings in order to prepare us for the narration of another spontaneous visitation and meal described by Luke in the gospel.
Some commentators and homilists have used this text to affirm the superiority of the practice of contemplative prayer over the active life. But as with the visitation to Abraham and Sarah, a lot more is going on in this story than what meets the eye.
It is possible that Luke was making the point that that Mary was entitled to sit at the feet of Jesus just as were the other male disciples in marked contrast to the Jewish custom that women were relegated to kitchen duties, to be neither seen nor heard. Thus Luke seemed to be moving beyond the demarcation of space between men and women. Mary was to have equal access to Rabbi Jesus so that she too might be able to take on a rabbinical role as teacher and preacher of the good news of salvation.
Luke’s gospel is unprecedented in its conscious inclusion of women in significant episodes and identifies them among his close followers. It is Luke who identifies a woman as the first to see Jesus after his resurrection. As one homilist put it, “Luke is not denigrating housework so much as suggesting that woman also have legitimate aspirations beyond the useful function of cooking and child bearing and taking care of men leading some to call him the original gospel feminist.” (Cf Fr. Jim Smith, Celebration Resources, NCR Publications, Kansas, Mo, 2007]
When we come this table, we need to incorporate the qualities of Martha and Mary. We need to be active participants, preparing ourselves for the feast of God’s word long before we arrive — it is not enough to roll out of bed “to get Mass in” – and after we have arrived we need to be attentive listeners at the feet of Jesus. There is much more happening than what meets the eye! It can be a genuine rendezvous with God.
If here is a progression of thinking in both the Old and New Testaments, there is also a progression of thinking in the tradition of the Church. Though this ritual is repetitive we ought not allow our participation to become routine lest we miss something very important for our health and spiritual well being and for the well being of the Church and the world.
The homilist is charged with the responsibility to open us up to what may lie hidden beneath the ancient texts and obscure ritual. In many cases, the homilist affirms what congregants already believe. I hope that happens more often than not. On other occasions, the homilist may challenge listeners to be more open to the realities hidden beneath the text and rituals. In both cases, the message may not be understood until long after we leave this assembly — in our conversations at our table at home or in our private reflections on the road or even in the midst of our daily work.
In this sense, the Bible does not have the last Word. God will always have the last word. The meal is never over and our faith must be nurtured and nourished daily at our own tables and at least weekly at this table because we never know when the Lord may be revealed through an unexpected visitor.
)