Liturgy
This link will keep 'parishioners-at-large' in touch with current creative liturgy sources and resources that respect a variety of 'traditions' within the Church.
COMMONWEAL Magazine
A 'lay' Catholic weekly publication with an accent on an intelligent analysis and commentary on curent issues, trends and concerns of interest to Catholics.
National Catholic Reporter
A national Catholic lay newspaper covering events not usually covered or presented with a clerical bias in the local diocesan press or but of concern and interest to Catholics.
Survivos' Network for those Abused by Priests or Religious
A National Network of self-help support groups for people abused by clergy or religious.
Bishop Accountability
Vital information about the disclosure of sexual abuse and related issues affecting Catholics in the pew and the manner in which Bishops continue to exempt themselves from accountability
Voice of the Faithful
A 'movement' of lay Catholics 'inspired' by the abuse scandal calling for greater accountability of bishops to 'Catholics in the Pew.'
+ 4th Week in Lent
Hope, an endangered species.
Readings: Isaiah 65:17-21 Psalm 30:2, 4, 5-6, 11-13 John 4:43-54
Thus says the Lord, “Now I create new heavens and a new earth. The things of the past shall not be remembered or come to mind.” [Isaiah 65:17]
The royal official said to him, “Sir, come down before my child dies.” Jesus said to him, “You may go, your son will live.” [John 4:49-50]
Most of us, no, all of us have made mistakes that we would rather forget. We don’t want to be reminded of our blunders—embarrassing moments to be sure. “Lord, do not remember the sins of my youth!”
This is also true of us corporately as a ‘people’ – as a church and as a nation. Yes, we have sinned as a church and we have sinned as a nation. However, failure – personal or corporate, cannot have the final say.
The latest edition of ‘Time’ magazine in collaboration with New America Foundation is focused on negotiating “the new reality” and being prepared for the next decade. It is their thesis that our future as a nation cannot be dependent on the mistakes of the past. True!
In his excellent book, The Naked Now, Richard Rohr, OFM, deals with the major shift in spiritual paradigms taking place inside and outside of the Church. He cites 20th century theologian, Bernard Lonergan, SJ in demonstrating the need for a conversion that is not based on fault-tinding but on a positive shift in the way we think about God, about ourselves and about our future. He states that we need to be healed of our subjectivity and become more open to conversion. Lonergan states that “conversion is the experience by which one becomes an authentic human being.”
Lent is a time for the healing of memories. Confession is good and necessary for the soul to heal but excessive guilt for past offenses can limit our potential for good and frustrate our effort to change what needs to be changed (healed) in our lives.
God has an intentional ‘amnesia’ when it comes to our failure. In fact, God counts our good efforts more than our failures. One of the greatest challenges of the Sacrament of Reconciliation is to forgive ourselves for past offenses. The recognition and admission of wrongdoing is essential in order to obtain forgiveness but once that has been accomplished, we need to” let go and let God.”
Good people make mistakes but good people say they are sorry and keep trying to do their very best and they keep hope alive.
I recommend The Naked Now by Richard Rohr, OFM, A Croosroad Book, The Crossword Publishing Company, New York, 2009.
Daily Scripture Archive»Although Andrew Greeley has never been my favorite theologians, it is difficult to ignore him as a sociologist. His empirical studies over time have had a significant impact on Church life in general. Oddly enough, the bishops have ignored his studies and banned his syndicated columns from appearing in most diocesan publications. As you know, this is the standard modus operandi of the American bishops—ignore the issue and it will go away. The only time they take full advantage of the American media is when the Pope comes to town and then we are treated to a feast of all the wonderful things happening in the American Church—with a clear spin on the positive.
The truth is that American Catholics have finally settled in—those still in the pew and they are many, and those in ‘diaspora’ and they are many to. Andrew Greeley is absolutely correct that the pope and the bishops lost a great deal of their moral credibility with the publication of Humanae Vitae by Paul VI, banning artificial birth control. Up to that time, Catholics were not abiding by the Church’s teaching on birth control but refrained from going to Holy Communion. After the encyclical, Catholics finally decided with the help of the pope’s own advisory communion on birth control that when there were good reasons to limit the size of their families in good faith and conscience and that it need not be sinful and therefore not a matter for ‘confession’ and repentance. (The pope’s commission on birth control overwhelmingly advised a change in the Church’s teaching on birth control.)
The second most significant contributing factor to the loss of credibility of the moral authority of the pope and bishops is the bungling of the sexual abuse scandal which continues to this very day.
The conclusion of all this is that Catholics have grown up and are assuming greater responsibility for arriving at a right conscience on matters of faith and morals. They love their Church and they adhere to the basic teachings of Jesus Christ but because they have access to biblical scholars and theologians with greater insight into the tradition of the Church than the bishops, they are taking greater responsibility for the practice of their faith.
This is not an entirely new phenomenon. In essence, Catholics are simply doing what bishops and priests have been doing for centuries, i.e., following their own consciences—conscientiously, not withstanding the embarrassment of excommunications and interdicts, neither of which mean much to conscientious Catholics.
In any case, I think the following article states it better than I. However, I’m not as confident as Father Greeley that there are large numbers of Catholics in diaspora who are just waiting for an invitation to return. They are looking for signs that Church leaders are willing to listen to their concerns and willing to dialogue openly about.
The irony of all this is that many of those who surround our bishops do not subscribe to their theology and their moral stand on many issues. I’m not sure how they justify their existence as they enforce policies and teachings they themselves ignore.
Go figure it!
Read and enjoy.
COMMONWEAL
August 15, 2008 / Volume CXXXV, Number 14
Signs of Life
A Sociologist Looks Ahead
Andrew M. Greeley
By way of setting the assumptions: Don’t expect real reform in the Catholic Church until the Roman curia is brought under control of local bishops. Vatican II was the most successful reform council in Catholic history-until the world’s bishops left Rome and the curia took control again. Now we hear that the council didn’t change a thing but was merely an exercise in continuity.
Unfortunately, the leadership that should have guided the energies released by the council elected to suppress them, and the Spirit has been forced to rely on the lower clergy and the laity to restructure the church. None of us will live to see an authentic post-Vatican II church emerge.
In many parts of the world, Catholic seminaries are nearly empty, parochial schools are closing, churches are locked during the day, and rectories, convents, and novitiates are vacant. Ideologues, representing no one but themselves, fight over the ruins. Still, there are signs of the times on the horizon, no bigger than the size of a man’s hand, that suggest enormous vitality in Catholicism and give grounds for hope. Some of these signs are validated by data, others by strong impressions, and others by unobtrusive measures. Most will be dismissed as meaningless by partisans of both the Left and the Right.
There are a lot more Catholics in the United States than anyone has been able to count, perhaps 15 million more than current estimates. There are no reliable data about the size of the Mexican-American population of the United States, legal and illegal. Thirty million would be a low estimate, and most are Catholic. While the Catholic Church loses some to Evangelical churches (especially when they display statues of Guadalupe), at least 75 percent of these immigrants remain Catholic. They are, for the most part, devout family people for whom religion and family are connected in an intimate way. “We believe,” a Latina graduate student told me, “that God is part of our family, and that when we have a celebration in the family, God comes and rejoices with us.” Not only are Latinos a new source of energy in Catholicism; they bring a dimension of joy that is difficult for anglicized Celts like me to attain. They are not a new obligation for ministry but a sacrament of joy the church desperately needs.
The identity of American Catholics is rooted in the Catholic imaginative and narrative tradition. Dean R. Hoge of Catholic University has asked Catholic laity what they consider the essential components of their heritage. Responses to his “cafeteria” of possible identity items-and they remained invariant across age and locales-emphasized the Resurrection, the Real Presence of Jesus in the Eucharist, God in the sacraments, concern for the poor, and Mary the mother of Jesus. These essentials have remained unchanged for about a thousand years. So the news couldn’t be much better, because these are the vessels of faith, the raw materials of theological reflection, the first fruits of the Catholic analogical imagination.
In the forty years since Humanae vitae, the birth-control encyclical, Catholics have learned to be Catholic on their own terms. When Humanae vitae appeared in 1968, some thought dissenting Catholics would either have to leave the church or stop practicing artificial birth control. Two generations later, it’s clear a majority of married Catholics maintain their love for the church while continuing to practice birth control. They do so by appealing to a God whom they believe understands married love. Despite constant denunciations from those in authority, and even suggestions from some that these so-called cafeteria Catholics should simply leave the church, such married Catholics stubbornly refuse to do so.
After forty years, the crisis does not seem likely to go away. There is not a country in the world (including Poland) where the majority of Catholics accept the church’s sexual ethic. As Margaret Daw, an Australian sociologist, has said, Catholics practice a “rationality of symbol.” They may not accept everything the pope teaches, but they still identify with him as representing the church and cheer him during papal visits. This is good news in the sense that the crisis has not torn the church apart. Neither side will change its position. The leadership is not prepared to excommunicate the dissenters, and the dissidents are not ready to decamp. How long can this crisis last? After forty years, is it still a crisis? In her Vatican II: A Sociological Analysis of Social Change (Princeton University Press), Melissa Wilde has suggested that it might take another council to salvage the wisdom of traditional Catholic sexual teaching-for which the writings of the past two popes on the spousal image of God might provide a frame.
Catholics have become more tolerant of homosexuals. In 1973, the first year of the National Opinion Research Center’s General Social Survey, 76 percent of Protestants and 71percent of Catholics asserted that homosexual sex was always wrong. In 2007, the percentages had declined to 65 percent and 47 percent, respectively. Much of this change, like most change of attitudes, is not the result of individuals changing their minds but of cohort replacement-younger respondents replace those who have died. Thus, in the cohort born before 1910, 86 percent thought that homosexual sex was always wrong, while in the cohort born after 1980, the rate has fallen to 38 percent.
Volunteer movements, strong among Catholics, touch on the essence of Catholicism: serving the least of one’s brothers and sisters. In parishes with an intelligent, emotionally secure pastor, volunteers abound-ministers of welcome (ushers), ministers to the sick, lectors, cantors, Eucharistic ministers, youth ministers, CCD teachers, sports ministers, parish and financial council members, school-board members, and parish trustees-there are scores of parishioners eager to assume responsibility for needed activities. In my parish in Tucson, there are seventy-five organizations cheerfully keeping the ship afloat. We have a mission in Haiti where young people spend their summer vacations building houses, teaching kids, visiting the elderly, and trying to bridge ethnic divisions. But too many parishes are innocent of this frantic activity. The pastor does not want anyone messing with his administration of the parish. And too many bishops have weak benches-not enough men who are prepared to minister to the tidal waves of eager laity.
Popular devotions, some scorned by liturgists, remain strong. The Sorrowful Mother novena and Sunday-afternoon Benediction have not survived, but adoration chapels, festivals in honor of the Eucharist (especially Corpus Christi processions), and devotion to Mary have. The mother of Jesus has managed to escape the silly sentimentality of the old Mariology and the one-dimensional ideology of radical feminists. Small wonder. Any symbol that suggests God loves us like a mother cannot but appeal. Latinos are adding their popular devotions. Guadalupe will simply not go away. Neither will other popular devotions. The artificial conflict between liturgy and devotions is a construct the Catholic people will never accept. Devotions are not superstitious. They remystify the world through the insight that grace is everywhere.
Last Holy Saturday I wandered over to Barrio Libre in Tucson, to the chapel of St. Martin De Pores, to participate in the Pascua Yaqui Passion Play. That particular part of the play included Judas being blown up by a barge of firecrackers. At first, some of this Lent-long play may hardly appear Catholic. In fact, it is certainly Catholic, despite the mix of folk religion. We should welcome such phenomena and respect the serious intentions and artistic sensibility of those involved.
Easter and Christmas attendance has replaced Sunday Mass as an identifying norm of Catholic behavior. Half our regular parish attendees show up in church a couple of times a month. The other half are enthusiastically present at the two major feast days. They don’t believe that they will go to hell for all eternity for missing a Sunday Mass. If asked why they don’t go more often, the answer is obvious: They don’t get anything out of it. The sermons are terrible, the music is horrible, and it takes too long. Yet the Eucharist remains important in their lives.
Despite the church’s lack of interest in teenagers and young people, the enthusiasm of young Catholics in some of the new movements is a remarkable, if underappreciated, phenomenon. By “new movements” I do not mean Opus Dei or the Legionaries of Christ but groups that have grown up around some of the religious orders, such as the Jesuit Volunteers, the Vincentian Volunteers, the Claretian Volunteers, Amate House, and Notre Dame’s Alliance for Catholic Education (ACE) program. When I was a much younger priest, I tried to nurture enthusiasm among the young, without much success. Their families did not want such enthusiasm to interfere with their children’s careers. I have been impressed by ACE and the discipline and skill I have seen in its members. At one alumni meeting last summer, I witnessed a great sense of enthusiasm. By combining intense educational and spiritual formation with a shared common life, ACE teams create an elan that is both exciting and demanding. When ACErs finish their two-year stint, 75 percent continue to teach, half of them in Catholic schools. I attended an hour-long seminar with ACE graduate students who were doing research on Catholic education. Similarly, in the Arizona desert last year we had two ACE teams working in impoverished communities (the only places ACE serves). Now there is a demand for more.
Friendship networks among Catholics are strong manifestations of Catholic community. In my current study of the Archdiocese of Chicago, I have discovered that 44 percent of Catholics say their five best friends are also Catholic, an almost tribal manifestation of community. There is evidence of this phenomenon in other dioceses. Being Catholic correlates positively with loyalty to the church, Mass attendance, refusal to leave, sympathy for the clergy and respect for leaders, agreement that Catholics should listen to papal teaching on the war, activity in the parish and other measures of affiliation, and financial contributions. Before developing this data, I wasn’t aware of such community networks, and I’m not sure many priests are aware of them even now. Yet these are enormously important resources. This is where all the volunteers come from.
Many fallen-away Catholics are merely waiting for invitations to return. My research in the Archdiocese of Chicago suggests there are some four hundred thousand “fallen away” Catholics. About half have left because of a mixed marriage. The other half have left because of the “other” issues-authority, sex, or a conflicted family background. Nearly half admit to occasional thoughts about returning, and 17 percent say that they think of it “sometimes” or “often.” Thus, there are roughly sixty-eight thousand “fallen-aways” in Cook and Lake Counties who might be open to invitations to return, and sixteen thousand who could be just waiting for an invitation. I know of no organized effort in Chicago to reclaim these lost sheep. In my parish in Tucson, the monsignor has been running a series for Alienated Catholics Anonymous for almost two decades. He presides over three series a year, and estimates that perhaps six hundred people have “come home to stay” since the program began. Some have become active parishioners-volunteers, in other words.
Barrio Libre, ACE, Alienated Catholics Anonymous, Guadalupe, the analogical imagination, cheers for the pope-these will never recreate the orderly, disciplined immigrant church into which I was ordained. But they suggest that something new and exciting is aborning. I look back on my eight decades with hope and, yes, delight.
ABOUT THE WRITER
Andrew M. Greeley
Rev. Andrew M. Greeley is a priest of the Archdiocese of Chicago. He is the author of The Catholic Revolution: New Wine in Old Wineskins (University of California Press), Priests: A Calling in Crisis (University of Chicago Press), and The Truth about Conservative Christians (University of Chicago Press), with Michael Hout. Commonweal | 475 Riverside Drive, Rm. 405, NY, NY 10115 | 212 662 4200 | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Commonweal Foundation
)