AMERICA Magazine
A balanced Catholic weekly magazine published by the jesuits of the United States for an intelligent Catholic readership. Go online to subscribe.
Liturgy
This link will keep 'parishioners-at-large' in touch with current creative liturgy sources and resources that respect a variety of 'traditions' within the Church.
Voice of the Faithful
A 'movement' of lay Catholics 'inspired' by the abuse scandal calling for greater accountability of bishops to 'Catholics in the Pew.'
Survivos' Network for those Abused by Priests or Religious
A National Network of self-help support groups for people abused by clergy or religious.
Bishop Accountability
Vital information about the disclosure of sexual abuse and related issues affecting Catholics in the pew and the manner in which Bishops continue to exempt themselves from accountability
National Catholic Reporter
A national Catholic lay newspaper covering events not usually covered or presented with a clerical bias in the local diocesan press or but of concern and interest to Catholics.
COMMONWEAL Magazine
A 'lay' Catholic weekly publication with an accent on an intelligent analysis and commentary on curent issues, trends and concerns of interest to Catholics.
+ 7th Week of Easter
Much ado about nothing or, is there something to it?
Readings: Acts 19:1-8 Psalm 68:2-7 John 16:29-33
Paul traveled through the interior of the country and down to Ephesus where he found some disciples. He said to them, “Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you became believers?” They answered him, “We have never even heard that there is a Holy Spirit.” [Acts 19:1-3]
Depending on one’s sacramental theology and pastoral practice, this text has been variously interpreted. For example, those who work with the RCIA (catecheumenate) hold that the sacrament of Confirmation should be administered with Baptism as it was in the early Church. It is one of the sacraments of initiation—Baptism, Confirmation and Eucharist. The Eastern Rite of the Roman Catholic Church has retained the tradition of administering all three at Baptism. Yes, the infant receives a small piece of the Eucharist bread. And so in the Eastern Rite, there is no formal celebration of First Holy Communion at the age of reason or Confirmation by the bishop at whatever age the local diocese has determined the age of maturity appropriate for Confirmation. All three sacraments are administered shortly after birth.
Others feel that the celebration of First Communion and Confirmation at a later age ensures the participation of youngsters in parish religious education programs – at least until Confirmation. In this case, many Catholics view Confirmation as the completion of or graduation from religious studies.
In recent years I have become convinced that the RCIA folks and the Eastern Rite Catholics have it right. All three sacraments of initiation should be administered together. First Holy Communion and Confirmation have become more social than spiritual. I do not mean to suggest that there is no connection or that there should be no celebration after sacramental ceremonies but for many, the accent is on the wrong syllable.
The path from Baptism to Christian maturity is life-long and the benchmarks for progress are not easily measured by grouping children by age or grade level for a period of preparation that is largely academic.
This is not to suggest that religious education is optional. Faith development is unique to each person within the context first of family and then of parish. Religious education / formation is intended to provide insight into faith development at an age-appropriate level.
Catholicism has become ‘child-centered’ the result of which, we have an adult population whose religious and spiritual development stopped at Confirmation.
The celebration of Eucharist is the primary setting for faith formation. Religious education is a necessary component but detached from Eucharist, it remain just another subject to master.
Of course this all assumes that the parish celebration of the Eucharist is truly inclusive and meaningful rather than just an empty ritual. The parish at worship should be a rendition of a community of faith that strives to live its faith ‘in the town square’ as I mentioned in Sunday’s homily.
Notwithstanding my commitment to religious dialogue, I do believe that effective dialogue is based on the assumption that although both parties are knowledgeable about the topic. Though they may have different perspectives, they are not based on ignorance of the subject.
Daily Scripture Archive»The ‘Art’ of Prophecy
The story is told about an eloquent preacher who was asked by a member of his congregation to recite Psalm 22, also known as “The Shepherd’s Psalm.” The preacher was gifted in oratory and had put to memory many biblical texts that he was able to recite with dramatic flair at will with little or no notice.
But there was in the congregation an elderly ‘pilgrim’ of deep faith and piety, a humble man whose life epitomized the life of the good shepherd. The preacher turned to the one making the request and then pointing to the elderly man in the pew replied, “Invite him. Indeed, I know the shepherd psalm by heart but this man knows the Shepherd.”
Amos was such a man who lived eight centuries before Christ and although he obviously didn’t know him, he knew the Lord well and is considered by biblical scholars, a prototype of Jesus. He was a poor layman of humble stock about whom little is known except that he was a country boy, a shepherd and a migrant worker from a small Judean town named Tekoa not far from the northern board of Israel. He received a call from God to go up to the northern kingdom of Israel during the reign of Jeroboam II to preach reform to people whose wealth and power had corrupted them. You can read a description of the state of affairs in any standard commentary on the text. Although at its peak of power and prosperity, it was in large measure a decadent society socially, politically and spiritually. It would not be an overstatement to suggest that Amos was less than diplomatic and politically correct when he addressed the men as “fat cats” and the women as “fat cows.” I’m not sure whether it was gall or courage that drove him to speak so directly and so boldly but his words were compelling.
Amaziah, the official priest of Jeroboam’s regime was an insider charged with the responsibilities connected with religious protocol and official worship – a sort of ‘Monsignor’ I suppose. He was a politically correct professional religious cleric and he served at the pleasure of the king. Amos threatened not only the religious but also the political and social status quo. In fact it was his God-fearing moral tone that permeated his criticism of the decline in the social and political mores of Israel and alienated him from the entire population except perhaps for the poorest members who were the primary victims of the corrupt society. In his mind there was no such thing as political and social life distinct from the laws of justice or devoid of religious meaning and of course, he was correct.
Amaziah wanted Amos expelled, deported back to where he belonged. Amos remained steadfast and would not be deterred from what he truly believed was God’s call. In a terse reply to Amaziah, he reiterated in simple language that because God sent him, he had no choice but to acquiesce to God’s call. That’s it in a nutshell whether or not the king liked it.
Saint Paul’s letter to the Ephesians was composed as a prayer of praise and blessing to accompany the celebration of Christian baptism that is the initial call to enter the full life of Christ as a member of his body. Paul, also a layman, was very conscious of this call and took very seriously, his partnership with God in Christ. He was a missionary and a prophet. Like Amos, his words were more compelling than entertaining. Last week we heard his confession of humanity that he insisted did not stand in the way of his call because he was empowered by Christ to speak for Christ. It took a long time for Paul to recognize his call but once he was convinced of its genuiness, he could not be deterred from preaching Christ crucified and risen from the death until his own death but he fulfilled his call with true humility and joy knowing that his strength came from God.
Though Son of God, Jesus was an itinerant lay preacher whose mission and ministry was uncomplicated. Unlike Amos or even Paul, he was what we might call a ‘gentle reformer’ not in the sense that he was soft or wimpy but like that described in the prophecy of Isaiah, “a bruised reed he would not break nor flickering flame will he snuff out.” His used parables and stories that contained lessons from nature and ordinary human experiences. He was meek and innocent but he was not naïve. He knew how the human mind and heart could be deceived but he never gave up on humanity even to the extent that he absorbed the effects of sin individual and communal, personal and institutional.
So the description of his commission to the disciples should not surprise us and it is from this commission that we are invited to take our own cue.
Though not completely aware of the implications of our call at Baptism, we grew to understand that call with the help of all the priests, preachers and prophets in our lives, most of whom are lay persons—parents, teachers and mentors and a host of people who challenge us to be our best selves without hassling us. Challenges stretch us and help us to grow; hassles stifle growth and limit access to truth.
So who are the prophets that have kept us honest in our pursuit of holiness, who got us to think through the issues of the day that we respond and act with integrity?
Sometimes prophets come from within the ranks of church leadership. Where would we be as Church were it not for Pope John XXIII when he convened the Second Vatican Council? He was a prophet whose time had come to challenge the Church not to condemn the world, but to engage the world in a dialogue that would allow us to discover new truths that would free us from the things that oppress humanity and prevent us from becoming all that God has destined us to be.
Prior to Vatican II, popes tended to oppose the world, issuing condemnatory statements against what they perceived to be a threat to the very existence of the Church, arbitrarily naming scientific theories and social-political movements as anti-Catholic “modernism” and even as it pertains to the American principle of the separation of church and state.
Vatican II was not just about liturgical changes but about a change in the mind and heart of the Church itself transforming it from an institution at odds with the world to a movement that acknowledged human progress while at the same time remaining faithful to the basic truths of Christianity. Pope John sought to ‘engage’ the world in a dialogue that would lead to a new truth that would enable all humanity to progress toward its destiny intended by God. This was also the underlying principle of ecumenism and dialogue with other religious traditions and even those of no specific religious tradition.
Pope John XXIII cautioned us to be aware of false prophets whom he referred to as “prophets of doom” who insisted on the rigid status quo, virtually isolating the Church from the world. These prophets of doom are still around and can be found among church leadership of every rank, clerical and non-clerical. They live in fear of truth and they deny the reality of the living Christ living within the Church in various cultures throughout the world and even in the hearts of those who do not know Christ.
That stated, it is still true that the Church has been prophetic in its teachings about the seamless garment of life and about the evil of war and poverty rooted in injustice. And yet, this does not preclude an honest and intelligent and authentic dialogue with those who view the nuances of right-to-life cases and causes as not as clean and clear as we.
We do not check our intelligence at the door of the church when we enter.
Where would the Church be without St. Joan of Arc and Catherine of Siena and a host of other individuals from the faithful at large who have challenged the Church to be true to its mission throughout the centuries? Joan of Arc was condemned by the Church and burned at the stake. Catherine was responsible for the return of the papacy from its estranged and confused locations in Avignon to Rome.
Thomas Merton is a marvelous example of the prophet whose prophecy was rooted in the contemplative life behind the cloister but whose words still impact on the lives of people in the streets around the globe, many of them Catholic, many of them of other religious traditions and of no specific religious tradition.
There are prophets among theologians and human rights activists to whom we must be attentive.
Some prophets come from ‘outside the walls’ as it were. Where would the Church be without the prophecy of Martin Luther King? The Church was as guilty of racism as the nation at large. Human rights activists have a prophetic role in the world and in the Church.
Women have a particular prophetic role in the world and in the Church today. The issues that face women in the world and in the Church are not going away and they will not be dismissed easily by the men in black or purple or white.
Even priests can be prophets. I recall on one occasion many years ago, I was waxing eloquent about an issue I felt impelled to explore prphetically with the congregation at Christmas. Two women left in the middle of my homily. I thought to myself, “uh oh, I have ruffled their feathers. I’m in trouble.” I caught up with them after Mass to inquire if my prophetic remarks had been too strong? They responded, “Oh, no. Neither one of us knew what you were talking about. It was just getting too hot in there!” I’m not sure whether they were referring to the heat in the church or what they considered ‘hot air’ from the pulpit!
I suppose in some sense, they had become a bit prophetic to me as their pastor, i.e., “Keep the message, prophetic or otherwise, clear and simple!” Thank you!
Is there a prophet in your life? I hope so. Is it possible that you may be a prophet to someone or to the Church itself?
)