Articles in the category "editorials"

Guest Editorial

Sunday June 6, 2010

A Pattern of Missteps, an editorial from COMMONWEAL Magazine. June 4, 2010 Apart from such political blunders, recent pastoral failures within the…Read full entry


Editorial - Op Ed

Monday September 7, 2009

Prophecy has its privileges but it also has its risks! Most of those who know me, also know that I am…Read full entry


Editorial - Op Ed

Saturday August 29, 2009

Bishop decries ‘combative tactics’ of a minority of U.S. bishops Published on National Catholic Reporter (http://ncronline.org) Albuquerque, NM A majority of U.S. bishops…Read full entry


The Grace of Good Friday

Friday March 21, 2008

Jesus is dead! Banks are closed. No mail delivery today. Off to Nassau and the islands for a break? or instead to Disneyworld? Color Easter…Read full entry


Open Letter to US Bishops

Thursday June 21, 2007

Last Sunday in observance of the fifth anniversary of the meeting of the US bishops in Dallas to hear the…Read full entry


Editorial - Op Ed

Sunday June 3, 2007

I have been thinking about drafting an ‘editorial / op-ed’ piece entitled, ‘The Catholic Wink.’ It’s a glib term…Read full entry


Editorial - Op Ed

Monday March 19, 2007

It’s a matter of conscience For several weeks in succession, I repeated the ‘pulpit’ announcement at the conclusion of Mass at…Read full entry


Tomorrow's Priests - a 'guest' editorial

Saturday January 13, 2007

November 3, 2006 / Volume CXXXIII, Number 19 EDITORIAL – COMMONWEAL Magazine The Catholic priesthood in…Read full entry


Unanswered Question Linger...

Tuesday January 9, 2007

Boston Globe on the Fifth Anniversary of Disclosure By Steven Krueger | January 7, 2007 It couldn’t be stated more…Read full entry


The latest article in category editorials

Guest Editorial

Sunday June 6, 2010

A Pattern of Missteps, an editorial from COMMONWEAL Magazine.
June 4, 2010

Apart from such political blunders, recent pastoral failures within the American church have also undermined the credibility of its teaching about abortion. Bishop Thomas J. Olmsted of Phoenix recently alarmed even many staunchly prolife Catholics when he publicly announced that Sr. Margaret McBride, RSM, had excommunicated herself by approving a request to remove a fetus from its mother’s womb in order to save her life. McBride served on the ethics committee at St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center in Phoenix. Late in 2009 a woman was brought to the hospital suffering from acute pulmonary hypertension, a life-threatening condition for any pregnant woman. If the pregnancy, then in its eleventh week, continued, both mother and child would probably die.

Abortion is not permissible under any circumstances, says Bishop Olmsted, not even to save the life of the mother. But others, including some very conservative Catholic moralists, think that, in cases where a pregnancy will almost certainly kill both the woman and her unborn child, separating the child from the mother is morally justified. The arguments here are complicated. Suffice it to say that the intention of those who remove the embryo or fetus from its mother’s womb is not to kill a developing child but to save the mother in a situation where the child has no chance of survival and the woman has no other chance. It is not clear to many Catholics why in cases of ectopic pregnancy the church will allow the removal of a fallopian tube—and with it an embryo—in order to save a pregnant woman’s life, while it will not allow the removal of a nonviable fetus to save a woman from dying because of pulmonary hypertension. It is not enough for bishops to say or imply: “Trust us. There’s a difference.” Nor is it fair to expect Catholics to overlook the death and human suffering occasioned by such theoretical subtleties.

The statements issued by Olmsted admit of no complexity or uncertainty when it comes to such hard cases. Certainly, the bishop had a responsibility to question Sr. McBride’s decision. What he should not have done was assume that she and others were acting in intentional defiance of Catholic teaching. Instead of simply announcing the excommunication of someone of good faith and great dedication who was faced with a now-or-never, life-or-death decision, why didn’t the bishop simply express concern that McBride might have erred, and explain that it is a bishop’s duty to investigate the incident? In that way, he might have avoided lending support to those who argue that the church cares more about embryos and fetuses than about their mothers, and that Catholic bishops won’t be satisfied until the law forces women to continue pregnancies that are a death sentence for both them and their unborn children.


Recent Articles

Twenty-Second Sunday in Ordinary Time 'C'

The Art of Knowing One’s Place Progress, man’s distinctive mark alone Not God’s, and not the beasts’: God is, they are Man partly…continue reading...

Women in the Church

*Women Challenge Gender Apartheid in the Catholic Church*
 by Angela Bonavoglia If ever there were doubt about the relationship between the Catholic…continue reading...

Fear Based Church?

Fr. Jim Martin is a prolific writer, as most everyone knows. He’s one of the editors at America. So what’s…continue reading...

A simple meditation

I received this simple little reflection from one of my website subscribers from Springfield, Vermont, Marilyn Thompson. I though visitors…continue reading...

Twenty-First Sunday in Ordinary Time (C)

Reading between the lines. The selection of texts this weekend are enough to get a preacher fired or worse if he…continue reading...